Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Privatization a disgrace to veterans, Says Michigan State Senator.

Today I found an interesting article in my email box. A monthly news letter from Michigan State Senator Vincent Gregory.

Here is what he has to say about it.



Sen. Gregory Demands Better Treatment of Veterans at Grand Rapids Home
I was appalled to find out recently that the private company that took over care for our veterans at the Grand Rapids Home for Veterans have resorted to posting online ads to fill some positions. Governor Snyder pushed for the privatization of the home and a private company, J2S, took over staffing operations at the Grand Rapids Home for Veterans in March of this year. Since the privatization has been allowed by Republican legislators and Governor Snyder, there have been multiple reports of daily understaffing and residents not being attended to or going unfed and uncared for.

Our veterans, the men and women who sacrificed so much to protect our country, deserve the highest quality care available. Instead, Governor Snyder’s administration is leaving their care to the lowest bidder. This is an outright disgrace. The state decided against privatizing our prisons. Why should inmates receive better treatment than our veterans?  (emphasis is blog owners).

The Michigan Veterans Affairs Agency (MVAA) authorized an amendment to the J2S contract to allow it to immediately begin soliciting subcontractors to help the company fill the workload. After laying off 144 hardworking union employees, J2S has desperately tried to find more certified nursing aides to fulfill its obligations, even going so far as to post on Craigslist to find more staff.

Governor Snyder needs to call on the Republicans in the Legislature to restore the funding that was cut from the Grand Rapids Home for Veterans. In the very short period of time since the home has been privatized, the quality of care has greatly decreased. We owe our veterans our deepest gratitude, and we can show it be restoring the quality of their care.

Now Mr. Gregory needs to look at the administration of the home too.. He missed that part.

Friday, April 19, 2013

Grand Rapids Home for Veterans- is there a need for a Dorm unit?

I think we can all agree that for the most part, the need for a veterans home in Michigan will continue for years to come. As long as America is involved in conflicts all over the planet, we will have people who need nursing care, for wounds received in those conflicts. Taking care of your veterans is a responsibility every nation must endure.

But what about the Dorm unit? The unit with little if any nursing care (compared to the full time care given on other units), but with it still available if needed, is more like college dormitory than anything. Guys and Gals assigned to this unit are ambulatory and self medicating. Their medical needs may be as little as just to pick up meds' once a month to severe as recovering from heart bypass surgery as Mac did. Mac had heart surgery at the VA hospital in Ann Arbor, was in intensive care for 12 days then returned to the Dorm unit to continue his recovery.

Some guys are there by court order, for what ever reason, some are there because they are able to take care of them selves, but need a structured limited environment to live in.  Still others are there because they had no place else to go.

And that is what I want to focus on. IS there a need for what some people would call a taxpayer funded flop house for homeless veterans?  The original Veterans home was built to give veterans from the civil war who were found in poor houses, a place to come and live. These veterans participated in the upkeep and maintenance of the home, and worked the farm that produced the food eaten at the home. And I am sure they had some privacy, however it may have been limited somewhat by the circumstances.

Todays' Dorm unit veterans need to be homeless, and like previous veterans, practically if not actually, financially broke or living at or below the governments "poverty" line. Many have alcohol problems, some have drug problems, others, mental problems.

The Dorm unit vets, mostly live in 2.3 or 4 man rooms. There are a couple of 1 man rooms, but they are the exception. 4 bed rooms are the norm, with 2 to 3 vets in them, each having about 64 square feet of living space. (That is an 8x8 foot area separated by curtains).

What is the current purpose of the Dorm unit? Is its purpose still the original one? That is to give homeless veterans a place to live besides the street? Is it to help veterans, to give them a needed "time out" so that they can get their lives back together and then to return to society, seeing how their nursing care need is minimal?

If the current purpose of the Dorm unit is still the original one, then the state needs to look at recent events at the home and question why so many veterans have been involuntarily discharged from the home.

If the current purpose of the Dorm unit is to give veterans a "time out" then again the state needs to look at why veterans are not being given the help they need, and the information they need when it comes time to move out, as required by law according to the Federal government. One of their officers contacted the owner of this blog to inquire if veterans were being given information when it came time to leave. Of course the are not so such was reported to them.

Veterans with drug problems are not getting help, those with alcohol problems are not getting any help, and those with other mental problems that could be helped with group therapy or what ever kind of counseling, are not getting any of that.

Since Taxpayer are paying for this facility and the cost of housing some of these veterans (those without pensions, disability income, or Service connected disability income, or any kind of income), the people have a right to know how their money is being spent, and why so many veterans were at the home, were discharged, and why many of them have been found dead on the streets after being evicted from the home.

If the original purpose of the Dorm unit, is still as it once was, then we have a serious problem. As long as the economy in Michigan remains in a state of depression, and a recovery is still years away, there will be a need for the Dorm unit. However, there is a greater need to review the administrations policies concerning this unit and to inquire as to why so many veterans have gone both in and out of its doors, leaving without the help they needed, and without being prepared to return to society.




Monday, April 8, 2013

Barnes aims to revamp MI vets' services

Appointed to Veterans Affairs Agency last month,

LANSING, Mich. (AP) - Michigan's new Veterans Affairs Agency director says the state needs to do a better job connecting its nearly 700,000 veterans to services.

Jeff Barnes was appointed to lead the agency within the Department of Military and Veterans Affairs last month. The agency will coordinate the state's veterans' services, which are housed now in 15 different state departments.

Barnes says the agency will begin with pilot projects in Wayne and Kent counties and survey services to see where gaps exist. He says he wants to eventually create a web portal to allow veterans to track their benefits claims throughout the often-lengthy process.

Barnes served as an armored cavalry officer for nearly 10 years in the U.S. Army and completed tours in Korea, the Balkans and Iraq.



----

I sure hope he can do something with THIS place..



 

Equal treatment? Apparently not.

I wonder how the Veterans living in the Grand Rapids Home for Veterans would feel if they know that while their health care givers were privatized, the ones that work at the other Michigan Veterans home the John Jacobetti Home For Veterans  in Marquette were not. 

Something is NOT right here..  Both do the same job, yet some get half the pay. No wonder J2S can't get enough people to work.

 

Saturday, April 6, 2013

Michigan Senator Asks why prisoners get better treatment than Veterans?

http://www.wwmt.com/shared/news/features/top-stories/stories/wwmt_state-senator-speaks-out-against-privatizing-care-michigan-veterans-9022.shtml

From Kalamazoo Channel 3 news website:

Updated Friday April 5, 2013.

Michigan - News channel 3 - A Michigan State Senator is speaking out against Privatiizing care for veterans in the state.

Democrat Vincent Gregory calls it an outright Disgrace.

Earlier this week an appeals court upheld the Governor's plan to contract out the care of veterans to a private company called J2S, but Gregory says the company cannot find enough qualified staff to care for the veterans and even posted ads on CRAIGSLIST to find workers.

Gregory says since the home has been privatized, the quality of care at the veterans home has greatly decreased.

Gregory says the state decided against privaatizing prisons, so why should prison inmates received better treatment than veterans?




Updated: Friday, April 5 2013, 05:55 PM EDT MICHIGAN (NEWSCHANNEL 3) – A Michigan State Senator is speaking out against privatizing care for veterans in the state.

Read More at: http://www.wwmt.com/shared/news/features/top-stories/stories/wwmt_state-senator-speaks-out-against-privatizing-care-michigan-veterans-9022.shtml
Updated: Friday, April 5 2013, 05:55 PM EDT MICHIGAN (NEWSCHANNEL 3) – A Michigan State Senator is speaking out against privatizing care for veterans in the state. Democrat Vincent Gregory calls it an outright disgrace. Earlier this week an appeals court upheld the governor’s plan to contract out eh care of veterans to a private company called J2S, but Gregory says the company cannot find enough qualified staff to care for the veterans and even posted ads on Craigslist to find workers. Gregory says since the home has been privatized, the quality of care at the veterans home has greatly decreased. Gregory says the state decided against privatizing prisons, so why should prison inmates receive better treatment than veterans.

Read More at: http://www.wwmt.com/shared/news/features/top-stories/stories/wwmt_state-senator-speaks-out-against-privatizing-care-michigan-veterans-9022.shtml
Updated: Friday, April 5 2013, 05:55 PM EDT MICHIGAN (NEWSCHANNEL 3) – A Michigan State Senator is speaking out against privatizing care for veterans in the state. Democrat Vincent Gregory calls it an outright disgrace. Earlier this week an appeals court upheld the governor’s plan to contract out eh care of veterans to a private company called J2S, but Gregory says the company cannot find enough qualified staff to care for the veterans and even posted ads on Craigslist to find workers. Gregory says since the home has been privatized, the quality of care at the veterans home has greatly decreased. Gregory says the state decided against privatizing prisons, so why should prison inmates receive better treatment than veterans.

Read More at: http://www.wwmt.com/shared/news/features/top-stories/stories/wwmt_state-senator-speaks-out-against-privatizing-care-michigan-veterans-9022.shtml
Updated: Friday, April 5 2013, 05:55 PM EDT MICHIGAN (NEWSCHANNEL 3) – A Michigan State Senator is speaking out against privatizing care for veterans in the state. Democrat Vincent Gregory calls it an outright disgrace. Earlier this week an appeals court upheld the governor’s plan to contract out eh care of veterans to a private company called J2S, but Gregory says the company cannot find enough qualified staff to care for the veterans and even posted ads on Craigslist to find workers. Gregory says since the home has been privatized, the quality of care at the veterans home has greatly decreased. Gregory says the state decided against privatizing prisons, so why should prison inmates receive better treatment than veterans.

Read More at: http://www.wwmt.com/shared/news/features/top-stories/stories/wwmt_state-senator-speaks-out-against-privatizing-care-michigan-veterans-9022.shtml

Tuesday, April 2, 2013

Veteran kicked out of Veterans home for parking in the wrong area?

Mac, keep up the good work and please post this to your blog. It upset me when I heard how they kicked you out, and I want my opinion heard. Thanks, Michelle V.


Ok Michelle, thanks for writing. Here it is folks, her letter to me, all I did was copy it word for word.


Mac,
  I understand how you could have been upset over finding the threat of having your car towed when it was parked at the building where you lived. How did they expect you guys to park in the designated area, when their own workers were taking the spots that were supposed to be reserved for veterans? Did those spots have any kind of notice of reservation on them?  And didn't you say that you never got one of those notices put on your car, that told people about the upcoming winter parking policy?

I know you told me the reason they kicked you out was because of how you responded to the threat of having your car towed, and that you thought they were stealing it. But  it seems to me, they had other reasons to get rid of you, and this parking thing was only the means to justify the ends. It was a tool to get you to act in a fashioned that would allow them to to justify evicting you from the home, your medical condition not withstanding.

IF I were in your situation I would have thought that they were threatening to steal my car. I mean, how do they expect you guys to pay to get your cars out of impound, when you only get 5 dollars a week? Or the 100 dollars if you have a disability pension?  It would cost about a minimum of over 200 dollars just to pay the towing fee, let alone the 35 dollars or more a DAY impound fee. Really I don't see how you guys could afford to get the car out of impound. Maybe this was a way to try to get you to give up your car and become more dependent on the home, or the government.


I know that if you live there, you get a tag that has to be placed on your rear view mirror, that the security people can see, and the security people also have a list of license plate numbers so that they know which cars belong to veterans.  They had to have know it was your car, and that you were living at the home when they put the towing ticket on the window. This makes me think you were targeted.

Didn't you say 3 other people got tickets, or something similar? I thought I recall  you saying 2 guys were told to remove their cars because the cars didn't run at all, but were parked out in back somewhere where they were not taking up any prime parking spaces.

I hope your 2nd appeal goes well. You have a tough battle ahead of you.

Michelle V.

(last name withheld to protect rights to privacy) - The Ed.




Two Groups fighting for control of Michigan Veterans home?

According to the mission statement of the Grand Rapids Home for Veterans:

 Our Mission: Provide compassionate quality interdisciplinary care for the members to achieve their highest potential of of independence, self worth, wellness and dignity.

Our Vision: Provide an environment that promotes meaningful quality of life by being a center of excellence in long term care.

Our Values: Strive to exceed our customer's expectations. Treat everyone with compassion, dignity, and respect. Each member, family, significant other, and staff services are valued as important resources. Recognize and honor all service to our country by the military, veterans, and individuals.


Really? Sorry People, but in my case, the Mission Failed. The Vision is not happening the way its posted here, and many veterans will say the quality of life has diminished in the last 36 months. But the long term care is as good as you can get it just about anywhere. And the Values statement is just a dream - reality shows things are different. 

In the time I spent at the home, one of the biggest concerns of the veterans was that they had no voice at the home. No one to speak for them. No one to act on their behalf. Someone in Michigan Department of Veterans affairs appointed one man to be an ombudsman, but this guy was and is, also a member of the board of managers. So how he can be both an advocate for the veterans and a member of the board without creating a conflict of interest, is beyond all common sense.

During the spring of 2010, the then Administrator Frank Snarski,  had to take medical leave. Then he decided to retire. According to rumor control the state had 6 months to find another replacement. Instead they temporarily promoted the head of kitchens (Sara Dunne) to the position of Administrator, and let her stay there for 2 years, until she obtained her college degree that made her eligible for the job.

It is said that the state posted the job, as required by law, and that over 100 applicants applied.
According to our contact in one congressman's office, 3 people OTHER than Sara Dunne were chosen as top contenders, but that some back room wrangling in Lansing, ended up with Sara keeping the job.

Since that time, a number of volunteer groups have either left or been forced out of the home. These were people who made the quality of life a good one, and made living there enjoyable. Without those people, the home is becoming worse than a prison, as the members have nothing to do but watch the clock and wait to die;  - that is if you are in a nursing unit. If you are in the Dorm unit, but have no resources, its like being in prison. You have no money to do anything with, and cannot go anywhere. It makes it difficult to work your way back into society.

With the understanding that the State of Michigan is suffering severed budget crisis due to loss of revenue from the severe hemorrhaging of jobs and people that left Michigan under the last 2 State Administrations, budget cuts were going to have to be imposed, and that any budget cut would have some kind of an effect on every veteran at the facility. But that change does not necessarily have to be a negative one.

It is a fact, that the current administration could be doing a better job overall, but they are following the existing laws, and recently passed a State Congressional ordered audit.  However running a HOME for people is more than just counting the beans so to say.

Some people say a political machine is running the place. Others say Governor Rick Snyder is publicly saying hes for veterans, while at the same time in private says he would rather see the place shut down  completely.   Which is the truth?

3 different congressional representatives (or their staff members) have told me that they supported someone other than the current administrator to take over as permanent Administrator of the home.


Volunteer groups, also seem to indicate by their comments and actions, that there is a struggle for who is to run the veterans home. A number of groups who have left the home, have stated that they would not return unless and until the current administration (under Sara Dunne) is replaced. Is this being said because of personal feelings towards the Administrator, or because of policy's imposed on them by the current administration? 

With no oversight boards in place, other than the board of managers, it is difficult to say if the volunteer groups have a grudge, or if their decisions not to participate at the home are for legitimate reasons due to poor administrating.

It is said that the group called Veterans of Foreign wars, or VFW and friends, are  the ones currently running all volunteer activities, and they are preventing some of the other service related organizations from coming in and helping the veterans.


Perhaps a call for a congressional meeting of the heads of those groups to discuss this issue, is needed. Members of the Legislature can meet with heads of the various groups in one big get together and find out the truth as to why so many groups are no longer volunteering at the home.  This might shed some light on what is really going on at the home.


Also, I think the Legislature needs to hear from some of the veterans. Not vets hand chosen by the Administration to go and talk to the congresspeople, but veterans who volunteer to go forth and be questioned by members of the state congress  or veterans chosen by members of congress itself.
Members from both Nursing and Dormitory groups.

Lets face it folks. When the board of managers doesn't even know an entire floor containing 2 units is being shut down, (as reported by Wood TV, and other news sources), that has to tell you something about the lack of professionalism, communications and balanced structure to the running of the home.

As it is, it seems there are 2, different fights for control of the home going on.
One is in the legislature, over who will be the permanent top administrator, and the other group fighting is about who is running the volunteers.











Monday, April 1, 2013

Another Veteran Dies on the street.

It is with sadden heart that I pass along the news of the death of Bill Tickner. Bill, aka Popeye or Papa Smurf, was a member of the Grand Rapids Home for Veterans, assigned to the  Dorm unit for a number of years. Bill was known by many in both Nursing and Dom units. He participated in Guitars for Veterans and was active in ceramics in the ITP room at the home.

But Bill like so many who have gone thru those doors, had a drinking problem.

In Bills case, he could not put it down. He never bothered any one, but rules are rules and he got caught with beer in his room, so they kicked him out.

Bills Brother in law was given the cell phone Bill had and started calling numbers. He reached me, and told me that Bill died on the 20th of March 2013. He died in a field over by the Butterworth dump, by one of the homeless tent cities. However, Bill was not found until the 26th.

His body has since been recovered and cremated per his wishes to his daughter.  A memorial for Bill is being planed, and will be held at one of the local churches some time during the 2nd week of April.


Bill is the 4th, former Grand Rapids Home for Veterans member, who had a drinking problem, who was NOT helped by the home, and instead kicked out, and whom ended up dying on the streets this year.

Is this why the home exists? Or is to prevent this kind of tragedy from happening?